Ask
Every search starts with a reason.
We’re building an independent record of every time someone looks at police camera or license-plate data. Cities will be able to show it to anyone, and it’s designed so no one can secretly change it.
Designed so video and plate data stay with the city. Only proof goes public.
Camera company
When a council, court or resident asks whether a search was allowed, the only answer often comes from the camera company’s own log. That is the company checking its own homework.
Think of a sign-in sheet at a front desk. Ours is designed to do the same for every search of camera or plate data — and the record is kept by someone independent of the camera company.
Every search starts with a reason.
Every request is checked against the rules, and the result is recorded.
Seal the record.
Post a public receipt.
Any change would show. Video stays private.
Anyone will be able to check a receipt online, without an account. If it matches the public fingerprint, the record hasn’t been changed since it was posted.
You don’t have to take the camera company’s word for it — or ours.
See sample mockups. Explore illustrative screens for a planned receipt checker, agency directory and monthly report — fictional data only, not live.
Open sample mockupsResidents, council members and journalists who want short receipts they can eventually look up without trusting the vendor.
Cities and police departments that need to show proper use, not just claim it. First focus: places with tighter camera rules — WA, CT, MN, NM, KY. Not a list of customers.
Campuses, ports, parking and security firms that run plate cameras. A later focus.
Cities increasingly need to show proper use of camera and plate data. A few sourced facts:
Minnesota has required independent audits every two years since 2015, and a documented reason or case number for each search (Minn. Stat. § 13.824).
Washington, Connecticut, New Mexico and Kentucky passed new license-plate camera limits in 2026.
Stateline counted 57 cancellations or rejections in 2026 by mid-August. Examples: Appleton WI; Plymouth MN; Tempe and Cave Creek AZ.
Not legal advice. Also flagged for lawyers: driver-privacy, public-records, evidence and data-sharing rules.
No. It’s designed so video and plate data stay in the city’s own storage. Public receipts and ledger fingerprints never include names, plates or video.
The city and approved auditors (for a set period). The design gives no one a single master key.
In our design, every request is checked against the rules, and the result (allowed or denied) is recorded. Denied requests are recorded too. We do not claim on this page that we always block access before data is shown.
Not yet. CameraAccessTrust is in development. If you represent an agency, ask about a pilot.
A U.S. provisional patent application was filed in October 2026. We do not publish the application number on this site.
No. We are independent of camera vendors. We plan to connect across brands — Flock first, then others.
Tell us how you’d like to talk.
For city managers, police, city attorneys and IT.
Email Gregggregg@cameraaccesstrust.com
336-403-1623
Preview illustrative sample screens of what we plan to build. Not live — fictional agencies and data only.